OneSCOne Supply Chain in China
Case 004 | Field-use issue diagnosis

Case 004: Dumbbell Connection Clearance Risk

About six months after delivery, the customer reported movement, noise and signs of loosening at the dumbbell connection point. The products had passed inspection before shipment.

Assembly ClearanceField FeedbackProcess ControlShipment Verification
Factory-side issue reviewU.S. fitness client
ProductDumbbell connectionFitness equipment component
Field signalMovement + noiseReported after about six months
Risk foundAssembly clearanceShaft-to-bore fit allowed movement
ActionShim addedPermanent process improvement
The real issue

A problem that did not show up during final inspection.

Because the products had passed inspection before shipment, the issue was not something obvious that had simply been missed. OneSC needed to understand what was happening inside the connection after repeated use.

Limited response

Inspect the finished product again

  • Checks current appearance and function
  • May miss a risk that develops after repeated use
  • Does not explain why movement appears inside the connection
OneSC response

Go back to the fit

  • Measure the shaft and bore dimensions
  • Review the actual assembly clearance
  • Discuss the fit with the production and assembly team
Investigation path

We went back to the fit between the shaft and bore.

Field feedback
Factory visit
Fit review
Dimension measurement
Clearance review
Engineer discussion
Clearance risk
Shipment verification
Shaft-to-bore fit
Thin shim added
1
Actual dimensions measuredAt the factory, OneSC checked the connection structure and measured the shaft and bore instead of relying only on finished-product appearance.
2
Clearance risk identifiedThe measurements showed that the assembly clearance allowed a small amount of movement, which could become noticeable after repeated use.
3
Thin shim introducedThe engineers agreed to add a thin shim to reduce the effective clearance and improve connection stability without redesigning the main components.
4
Process improvement retainedThe change was not treated as a temporary repair for one shipment. It was added as a permanent process improvement for future production.
What changed

The next production run used the improved assembly method.

The key fit dimensions and assembly condition were checked before shipment. That shipment has now been in the market for approximately 10 months, and so far the customer has not reported the same movement, noise or loosening problem again.

01

Start from field use

The risk only became visible after months of actual use.

02

Measure the fit

The real issue was a small tolerance and assembly condition inside the product.

03

Change the process

The shim was added to the production method, not just used as a one-time repair.

04

Reduce repeat risk

The purpose was to make the same problem less likely to come back.

Some quality problems cannot be controlled by final inspection alone.

OneSC's job is to understand why a problem happened and make sure the same problem is less likely to come back.

Do you have products that pass inspection but fail in the field?

Start with one critical process. OneSC can review the factory-side cause and help close the same risk before the next shipment.

Review one process